Yokohama BluEarth-ES ES32 vs Continental ComfortContact CC6

Pricing

Enter your tyre size below to see the best prices for your specific size (if unsure, check placard on the driver's side door or your existing tyres).

Yokohama BluEarth-ES ES32 vs Continental ComfortContact CC6 in Australia

The BluEarth-ES ES32 has been around in Australia for about 7 years, whereas the ComfortContact CC6 has been on the market for about 8 years

Both tyres are rated for premium touring summer action. Both tyres are designed for use with regular passenger (non-SUV) vehicles.

Both of these are considered summer tyres. Neither of them are runflat tyres. Yokohama is considered to be a mid-range brand in the tyre market, whereas Continental is a premium manufacturer.

Read on to see how each of these tyres stack up against each other!

Comfort

UTQG Data

Introduced by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in the USA, the Uniform Tire Grading System (UTQG), is a system for comparing one tyre product to another on the basis of some standardised tests.

Treadwear

Traction

The UTQG system measures traction as straight-line braking in dry conditions. The scale is AA, A, B, C, with AA being the best grade, and C the worst.

Temperature Resistance

The UTQG temperature resistance tests measure how well tyres can dissipate heat that builds up due to friction with the road. The scale is A, B, C, with A being the highest grade.

Warranty

Unfortunately, we don't have any warranty information available for either of these tyres.

Comparisons With Similar Tyres

Still on the fence about these tyres? Check out how they compare to other similar tyres on the market in Australia!

• Yokohama BluEarth-ES ES32 vs BluEarth-GT AE-51

Summary

Let's now take a look at the main differences between these two sets of tyres.

All in all, the BluEarth-ES ES32 tyres get a score of 77 out of 100, while the ComfortContact CC6 tyres get a score of 69 out of 100.